Accountability gap / 01

The siege and the cutoff of essentials

9–10 October 2023

The officials in key roles

UK: Rishi Sunak, prime minister; James Cleverly, foreign secretary; Kemi Badenoch, business and trade secretary; Grant Shapps, defence secretary. US: Joe Biden, president; Antony Blinken, secretary of state; Lloyd Austin, defence secretary. UN mission lead: Linda Thomas-Greenfield.

What was reported at the time

Reuters reported Borrell’s condemnation of the total blockade on 10 October. The cutoff of water, food, electricity and fuel was publicly known.

The warning

The UN rights chief warned against collective punishment that same day. This was a contemporaneous warning, not a concern invented after the event.

What governments did

UK officials publicly supported self-defence and military cooperation; the cited Commons export-policy record shows licences were retained during the Conservative government. In December the US vetoed an immediate humanitarian ceasefire text and the UK abstained.

Protective options / not a claim of action taken

What was available

Badenoch could revisit licences with Foreign Office assessments; Sunak and Cleverly could seek a ceasefire and make cooperation conditional on access. Biden and Blinken could use arms policy and the US vote to apply leverage.

The documented gap

Policy continuation and later recorded vote

The UK did not adopt a general suspension in this initial period. The subsequent December vote shows the US blocking, and the UK declining to support, an available Council route to a ceasefire.

Evidence boundaries

Public warnings establish information available to officials, not proof that each minister read a particular article. Self-defence statements are not the same as an express endorsement of every siege measure.

Sources

[S65, S66, S56, S64, S91]

Roles and powers are explained in the decision-maker map. Sources distinguish reporting, official decisions and legal conclusions.

← All phases

Ask for the decision record.

Request the assessment date, the minister who authorised it, the conditions considered, and the evidence used to decide whether those conditions were met.

Use the letter templates ↗